Archive for the ‘slavery’ Category

I was reading a status update on a friends Facebook page and he was saying that we are already in slavery and I tend to agree but this got me thinking when was the British government for the people and I realized that it never was.

I am not quite sure when it happened but at some point in history the peasant class began to believe that the powers that govern us are there to serve us, in fact this a very clever ruse I am sure that when the Labour party came to power in the late forties they was very much for the people and more importantly for the workers but that soon changed.

The modern ruse of government for the people became essential after World War 2 when the middle and the upper classes had been decimated along with the rest of the male population and the population that was left was largely women who had been working towards the war effort doing the jobs that had been male dominated since the beginning and if the men and the government thought for one second that they would be willing to return to servitude of motherhood they had another thing coming.

The side effect to this was for the first time the lower classes had a very high opinion of themselves and was going to be heard and they did this by sweeping a party into power that was at first for them, this would result in the National Health Service plenty of social housing and a school system that was the envy of the world as far as poor people were concerned, this mindset would persist for at least the next 40 years but as time and governments have come and gone the erosion of the lower classes has been as constant as the ocean on cliffs.

By the 80’s the middle class had become much larger and the poorer in society had become used to moving up the social ladder but the rich would not sit idly by and let the class system be dismantled, another thing that happened was that most of people who remembered the bad old days of when the poor got sick they usually died were coming the end of their lives and with that generation went the will to change the political scene.

Counter Revolution

As far as the rich were concerned the poor had become to much effort and something had to be done the answer would be Margaret Thatcher she would lead the counter revolution against the poor and make sure that big business would be back on top in a secure position. She would do this by provoking the unions into industrial action and then use that as an excuse to demolish the trade unions through a mixture of propaganda and violence via the media and the police force as was seen during the coal miners strikes and the poll tax riots.

In the end Thacher won and the Trade Unions were vastly reduced and so was the pay of the commoner through the implementation of high taxes this brutal warfare left its scar in the form of the poor losing the political will to fight and this allowed the Privatization of the UK plc. Although this action did result in a initial economic boom and peoples disposable income was increased if you worked in the private sector but with this came the price of little or no job security and inflation would deminish what money people had available for all but the richest in these classes.

Things were about to get a lot worse in 1997 Tony Blaire blew the conservatives out of the water in a landslide election under the guise of new labor which would become more blue than the Tories and during his ten years in office Tony Blaire not only continued the anti union rhetoric but also implemented a very crafty piece of legislation The National Minimum Wage not only did this piratically stop most low paid workers pay rises but is also legitimized the continued persecution of the lower class by the private business.

New Labour’s biggest legacy would be actually be one of WAR and debt because in our alliance with the US we invaded no less than three sovereign countries resulting in countless deaths and a massive expenditure of public finances that saw many large British and American companies increase their balance sheets, mix this with the continued deregulation of the financial sector and you end up with the 2008 financial crisis.

Although it was the conservatives who gave us the current financial sector by selling off everything that the British government owned it was Labour that continued spending and shoring up big enterprises and then selling off over half of the British Gold reserves at a time when Gold was at its lowest, even the most green economist would have told you this is a bad idea.

Common Misconception

The common misconception that government is for the public is surprising when you look at the history of Britain many people would point to the signing of the Magna Carta when people were freed from serfdom and given protection of the state from persecution was the beginning of a free state for all people, but if you look at the Magna Carta you will notice that many of its clauses have been altered or repealed over the years and only the ones that would cause a revolt to repeal have been kept.

If you speak to a lot a British people about the days of the Empire and you will get this idea that people from all levels of society got something from the spoils of empire but again if you look past the rhetoric you will see that the empire was actually a collection of private business and financial institutions that ruled with an iron fist backed up by their friends  in Whitehall who used the  Royal Navy and British Army as enforcers for these extremely rich people. It was only when the American colonies decided they had enough and rebelled resulting in a brutal war which as we all know was won by the newly called Americans and is now called the revolutionary war of independence.

But this would not be the last time that the British would brutally try to put down any dissent shown by the locals such as the Sepoy mutiny where hundreds of thousands of Indians where massacred only this time the British were victorious. And the list goes on until the final dissolution of the empire in the fifties, and all of this was done by the current parliamentary system that we have with little or no consequences for the ruling elite. The Empire did enrich many British families but not the poorest in society and the most numerous of the country.

Back to the Present

Getting back to the present you can see that the British Government have been doing the bidding of the private companies ever since they had first refused to pay the kings taxes and depose him in a revolt that would allow them to create a system that would guarantee the families at the top could stay there.

The Parliamentarians created a government for the private business that was hijacked by the poor and the Americans created a government that was for the people but hijacked by private business’s and apart from a few set backs in the twentieth century you can see that the mega corporations are back in control and more powerful than ever, although the east India companies have long gone the families that run them live on.

The single biggest problem facing the free men and women of the UK is actually what is not being talked about, in 1992 our government and many others signed up for United Nations Agenda 21 this is the driving force behind much of the pro green pro business rhetoric in the modern western world and other global agreements which give the governments the framework needed to continue to take our rights for the greater good.

Where next

The answer is pretty simple we have become so disappointed with our leaders that we do not see the point in voting any more and not only is this exactly what was wanted but it also dangerous. In the last election nearly all of the middle and upper classes voted resulting in the current Conservative led parliament and it was only the students that upset the apple cart by voting in the LibDems in enough numbers to force a coalition. However due to the total lack of political will power the libdems have proven themselves craven and we are likely to see either a total conversavative or Labour government neither of which have our well being at heart.

What is needed now is a new political class one which is not arcane or corrupt the way the current parties have become and our predecessors showed after the war that this is not impossible and that we the lower and by far the largest section of society can influence the direction in which the country is being taken but first we need to forget the old corrupt parties and look for something new.

Their are many who get caught up in the right wing rhetoric but the truth is this type of mentality is exactly what the current ruling parties want because they know that although people may be angry they are not willing to risk a fascist Hitler style figure rising up and causing a civil war. Although immigration is a problem it is not largest problem facing the average tax payer.

What is actually needed is a party that will listen to what people want and allow the majority to have a say in events that shape all our lives and one that is willing to put into writing a Bill of Rights for the People. We do need a strong immigration policy but also we need expertise from overseas and yes we need to curb the ambitions of corporations while encouraging economic growth and yes we need a safety net of social welfare but only for short periods of time not as a lifestyle and lastly we need to feel safe but at the expense of our freedom.

If you want to change the country start small and big things will happen, any vote used is not a vote wasted just don’t vote for the corrupt mainstream parties that are only interested in keeping the status quo.




The national minimum wage (NMW) in the UK is a national slavery industry, I remember it being hailed as a good thing when it was implemented but now older and wiser I see it as legitimizing forced labor in the private sector. I know many will say that I am focusing on the negative or over exaggerating the effect of the minimum wage but lets just break it downMan digging through the word poverty

  • Minimum Wage is £6.02 per hour worked
  • average week is 45 hours
  • That is a wage of £1094 per calendar month before deductions
  • So on Minimum Wage your likely to take home £750 roughly after Tax and NI
  • The Average Rent is £500-600 a month and travel £100-150

I am very fortunate at never having to have worked on minimum wage due to the fact that I was able to fall into a trade from school and by the time the NMW was introduced I was already earning £15,000 which was considered a good wage at the time, but many here in the UK are not so fortunate and end up working in retail and services which is largely minimum wage.

On paper the concept of forcing the employer to pay a minimum wage looks like a good idea but there were two unforeseen consequences by the original policy makers

  1. No effort was made to look at the cost of living and implement a minimum wage for each county/town so that in some areas people did well and in others people lost out.
  2. and two the NMW allowes companies to keep wages in areas artificially and unethically low while taking all rights under the law for the employee to question the set wage.

A Taste Of Their Own Medicine

Any politician that blindly defends the NMW should be forced to live on it for 6 months with no outside interference and I am sure we see them struggle even more than the average poor person is forced to live for the rest of their lives this would allow the policy makers to get a taste of their own medicine.

But it truly is a shame that this kind of situation has even arisen and even worse that the basic problems have not been sorted over a decade after the NMW was first introduced if we had policy makers that actually knew the plight of the poorest in our society blogs like this one would not exist.

In the next couple of years we are going to see the Tories making even deeper cuts into government spending and in response to this local authorities are guaranteed to increase taxes to keep their over inflated budgets and salaries rising well above inflation while the people at the bottom are on the verge of starvation.

Keep the National Minimum Wage or Get Rid Of It

So what am I advocating do we keep the National Minimum Wage or Get rid of it well above I pointed out some basic and serious flaws but nothing fatal that could warrant the legislation being removed no what is suggest is

  1. Amend it to be a Local Minimum Wage based the local cost of living
  2. Have it increase every year at the same percentage of the growth of GDP if negative then at 1% above inflation.
  3. Increase the tax threshold to £16,000 per year

This would go a long way to helping the people at minimum wage level increase their living standards as well as help the economy with as more people with disposable income will allow more spending and reduce the burden on the welfare state. On a final not I Man stacking shelvesthink that companies who decide to lay off staff because of the company losing money should have to prove that they are falling into negative income rather just just slimming their profit margins.

I think its disgusting that a company can lay thousands of staff but still make £20 Million pound profit to pay share holders as we have seen year in and year out since 2007. We should implement simple changes to the legislation to make the national minimum wage a national pride not the slavery that it currently is.

Osbourne Is As Clueless As Ever

George Osbourne the chancell0r of the exchequer today went onto the BBC Andrew Marr show and showed the country just how far from reality he is. He claims that the economy is healing and that we are on target to clear our

George Osbourne

deficit firstly our economy has had negative growth so far this year and our deficit has gone up not down so Mr Osbourne please tell me where you get your ridiculous idea that we are in a good economic position.

I am beginning to realize that Andrew Marr show is place for politicians to go and justify their actions with little or no interference from the media as Andrew Marr seems either unable or unwilling to challenge the idiotic statements put out by the leaders of our country. This is not a good thing because the media is supposed to challenge and debate on our behalf as the likes of the Prime Minister or the Chancellor would never be allowed to debate in an open forum because it would show just how little they know and how weak their policies are.

In regards to Osbourne he shows his mentality when making statements like “If there was a quick fix, or an easy road, I would be the first on it. There is no alternative easy road.” Firstly he admits that he doesn’t know what to do and is being forced down the path he is on and would prefer an easy life otherwise known as being lazy and secondly he says there is no alternative easy road but he fails to mention that there is an alternative hard road.

The other hard road is to force banks into lending by demanding the tax payers money back with interest if they do not loan and allow the rotten institutions with the bad debt fail. Reduce the size of government and reduce taxes to give people more disposable income to allow more spending. Reduce house prices by forcing Buy-To-Let owners to sell their properties and then follow this with massive investment into rebuilding heavy industry in the middle and north of England.

In the Mail on Sunday George Osbourne was quoted as saying “A key part of recovery is building the houses our people need, but a familiar cry goes up: ‘Yes, we want more housing; but no to every development – and not in my back yard’. Well Mr millionaire Osbourne (4.3 million) how about we come and dig up your mansions gardens and build a highrise building and see how you like it, rather than making planning easier on poor people’s properties how about forcing any one with over an acre of land to give some up for housing development. I am sure the rich would object a lot more to having the government force build housing properties on their land.

The Osbourne Legacy

So what is he proposing to get us out the mess we are in, Less regulation in planning authorities allowing the building of more houses, Firstly he fails to understand that we do not have a shortage of houses, we have a shortage of available housing due to the buy to let market sucking up all the houses and forcing working class people into renting for life, so rather than tackle that problem Osbourne decides to allow development companies a free reign on building over our green spaces and bulldozing over local peoples objections in the name of profit.

From what I can see the Osbourne Legacy is one in which the low wage taxpayer will be forced back into serfdom by increased Chained hands in slaverytaxes to pay for the mistakes of the financial sector and the misguided attempt of the Conservative party to save their friends from financial ruin while financially ruining the rest us for generations. So not only will we be unable to live a decent life outside our increased working hours which are sure to be increased but we will be trapped in renting while our parks and woodland are built over to make way for new houses for the already better off middle classes of the UK. The Legacy proposed confirms just how George Osbourne is as Clueless as Ever.

Agenda 21 Global Greenprint agenda 21 cover

In 1992 the United Nations convened the Earth Summit in Rio to announce the Agenda for the 21st century it would be an action plan a global greenprint for a sustainable future of the human race. What is written on the first page describes what Agenda 21 is:

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

And to just to reassure you that this is not all government hype and empty promises at the bottom of the page it goes on to say:

The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Program for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.

In 1995 the UK started the environment agency and you may have noticed that exactly ten years after the 1992 summit the world leaders were made to publicly and openly promise that were going ahead with their commitments for Agenda 21.

Why Is Agenda 21 Different

The question I know on most people’s lips will be why is agenda 21 different well unlike most plans that are implemented on a national scale this a very serious and dedicated approach by using all levels of society Global is the use of UN and UNESCO then Nationally by using local government, parliaments and places like the European Parliament and then locally this includes local authorities such as councils and the local population via our children and indoctrination.

Hold on one minute local population I didn’t know about this and your right, I found out about Agenda 21 by accident through a documentary and most people have never even heard of this plan. But I bet you have heard of the UK youth parliament and may have even noticed that companies and the government has taken massive interest’s in getting more youth and more women into key positions within private and public companies, the reason for this shift in decades old policy is not because of a change of heart it is all to do with Agenda 21 which dictates that special emphasis must be put on women’s rights and youth input.

The main reasoning that I can see behind this strategy is because youth and women have always been the more radical and readily acceptable to change than men as you will have seen for example in the sixties when majority of protests were held by young students or women’s groups, rarely do you ever see men in the 30-55 age group who are willing to upset the apple cart as the dominant members of society well until recently anyway and this is why this agenda is so different and successful.

Greener You Get The Redder You Get

I have quite a few reservations about the current political interest in climate change as the greener you get the redder you get as the people in charge keep centralizing and adding more and more rules and regulations which was main drive behind communism and central planning, when you read through Agenda 21 you will notice the references to things like population control regulation and human resources. No longer do the powers see us as people but as a resource that needs to be controlled and regulated for our own good and the good of the environment which is now being given the same rights as humans under Agenda 21.

I see this whole process like the ripening of a tomato its starts small and green and ends up large and green swastikared but then the tomato becomes to heavy for the stem and it falls to ground and rots this is what I see happening to the new socialist sate of the United Nations, does it not seem coincidental to you that no sooner than Soviet Russia falls (1990-1) than we have a new big idea to consolidate the world power and resources into the hands of a small group of individuals. All of those short sighted leaders who signed up to the global world order that will eventually enslave us all never really saw that UN was only reimplementing the socialist model of collective farming and the concept of Population control and central planning but this time all in the name of sustainability.

Reading Between The Lines

I would like to break down to individual terms used within agenda 21 and try to decipher what was actually meant when it was written.

  • sustainable development this mean that we will all need to be carbon neutral as private property signin we will not be allowed to do anything that may hinder nature and will need to be authorized by central planning.
  • States have decided to establish a new global partnership is the nicer way of describing a single world government aka a New World Order.
  • eco-sensitive zones restricted areas set aside for nature, No one knows just how big these reservations will be.
  • Human Resources this is a term widely used and in its rawest form mean that humans are just a resource to be used until no longer needed.
  • land-use policies strict rules that will govern any use of any land notice that this does not differentiate between and public and private land use.
  • human settlements the fact that this term is only one I could find referring to where people would live makes me think of gulags and labor camps.
  • Smart Growthis heavy regulation on any future population centers and strict control of humans.

Overall the above shows that according to the UN we take up to much space use to many resources and require intensive legislation to ensure that we do not continue to hurt the environment. At first glance this would seem like a good idea but when you read further you will notice that they always relate these problems to the proletariat or the working class and poorest in society.

Common Good Or The Rights Of The Community

When you look at the common good or the rights of the community you see that this is the assassination of the individual and that whenever you do something as an individual you will be seen as selfish or anti social and you will see that view of the greater good will be always be set against the will of the individual and this is otherwise known as mob mentality. A good example of this is the constant demonizing of the private car and promotion of public transport as the savior to all our problems.

The problem with the common good is that it almost always hinders the rights of the individual and when its put on a national scale like in the EU were Greece is being pushed out to save the rest of the common market you get gross actions by people who if put on the spot would act otherwise. It is easy to say kill a goat so that the group can eat especially if it is not you doing the killing, its not so easy when its you killing the goat so you can eat but from a government perspective it is great as it absolves all individuals of personal responsibility making hard choices very easy which could lead to atrocities in the name of the common good you only have to look at the situation in the Gaza strip to see the effects of the common good mentality.

The rights given to the individual are very specific and therefore very difficult to amend without having to fight and impossible without absolute justification, the rights of community on the other hand are merely guidelines and easily amended which leaves you as the individual very vulnerable as it is the ruling elite who dictate what is the required needs of the masses at that given time and are subject to change depending on circumstance regardless of how this may impact on you personally.

What is the purpose of Agenda 21

We all have to ask ourselves the question of what it he purpose of Agenda 21 at first you will say well its to make sure the human race survives, and I would be inclined to agree to a point I however think that the real purpose of agenda 21 is to control people to the point of slavery a kind of futuristic feudalism based around protection of the environment, every page of Agenda 21 makes reference to new organizations and new rules and new regulations that will or should be implemented to save us but not once does it make reference to the rights of the individual.

The single minded purpose of Agenda 21 is the saving of the environment regardless of the social cost and if you think I am being paranoid then read this:

“Smart Growth promotes well-designed, compact, functional communities and rejects land-hungry sprawl and wastage of greenfield land.”

which means that anyone living outside of a city is an unacceptable risk to the environment and therefore needs to be removed. Pro Agenda 21 lackeys always use the term “promotes” this is in fact a veiled threat what it actually means is that you will conform or else be punished.

But all this mindset cannot come just from saving the environment so what is it, well I think that it is a very carefully orchestrated plan to get us all to conform to the idea that we are the cancer we are the ones causing the ills in our society and the environment. Governments by design are power hungry and are constantly looking for ways in which to eradicate the very thought that you or me are individuals because this equates to those in power that your an anarchist and that you reject authority so must be marginalized and Agenda 21 is the perfect framework to ensure the continuation of the centralized government.

Implementation of the Eco-world

Agenda 21 is a soft-kill weapon which has been infiltrating our society for two decades and I have found evidence of this Ecoterrorism everywhere I have looked from the government and the Environment Agency to my local council. The Agenda for the 21st century is being implemented Globally Nationally and Locally through legislation, think tanks and even through our children this is unrelenting and will succeed if we allow it to. The whole reason this is being done so slowly is to keep it in the shadows so that the ground work can be laid without hindrance as it has been for many years already. I ask you this though if this is so good for us all and the end result will be a green utopia with no poverty why keep it secret?

EUsurveillance with all seeing eyeThe other area of implementation is the destruction of agriculture we have seen systematic destruction of the farming industry either by design or neglect and the only reason for this that I can see is to corner the market with a small number of big Aggro companies such as Monsanto who can use genetically modified crops to feed these future super metropolis of Human Settlements at a huge profit. In the next few years we will see more and more crop failures caused by erratic weather patterns and companies who GM products will come save the day with crops that we have no idea of the long term effects but when hungry we will accept these overpriced products happily.

If you think that the common person will be content in these new super cities your wrong, we will be worked to death or exiled into the wilderness to die from exposure, in fact you can see truth of this in the way that city states used to operate in ancient Greece. As a commoner you will be required to work to justify your existence and if you cannot provide for yourself you will starve and there will be nowhere to run to as this is a Global plan.

What does the Future hold

The inconvenient truth is the word is overpopulated for the current way in which our species survives so we do need a change in direction but not to the point in where we live in centralized population zones being zipped from city to city by 300mph trains with no interaction with nature, I think that if we do not wake up we will see small towns and villages populations relocated into urban cities and that the brave new world that Aldous Huxley envisioned one where humans are bred for specific purpose based on the societies requirements and only the Alpha’s or the elites would be allowed to have enjoyment outside of work hours.

The future is certainly bleak if we don’t adapt when the finite resources to run out billions will starve and the planet will descend into a mad max style chaos and it would take two or three thousand years for us as a species to recover if ever and if we accept the socialist centralized plan that is Agenda 21 we are likely to be slaves while the top one percent live like kings as they did in communist Russia until it either collapses through excess or kills off most of the world population in an attempt to retain superiority.

red man standing out from the crowd

But there is a third way, we have an era of personal responsibility we take it upon ourselves to stop pointlessly wasting our planets resources we take the initiative and most importantly we stand up and defend the rights of the individual. For over twenty years this has all been done in open secrecy so lets lift this veil and talk about Agenda 21 and what it means for us a species for the biggest weapon we have is education, take responsibility and educate yourself read up on this socialist Eco-terrorism that could end up with us living under tyranny disguised as the common good. If you take anything from this article understand this you can bury your head in the sand if you want but this will continue until you can no longer ignore it.

I would like to say to people who live in the cities don’t think it will not affect you as we city dwellers use the most amount of energy per head than anyone else in the world and to those living rural areas this affects you in the way that you have more land then anyone else and the Green agenda wants to reforest as much as they can, We do need to act individually but we can all shout together to be heard. A football crowd is a crowd of 20,000 individual voices singing the same song if we can do that on this Agenda and show the world that green is the new red then maybe we can salvage something from this train wreck.

Other links to see if you want to know more

China’s Very candid Agenda 21 population control plans

Infowars article on Agenda 21

Behind the Green mask Rosa Kiore gives excellent speech on agenda 21.